Use of siRNA for RNA Interference:
RNA Interference (RNAi), the transfection of nucleic acid
into cells to knock down the expression of a specific gene of interest, has
proven to be a very powerful tool in the exploration of gene function. One of
the most popular and easiest methods to perform RNAi is the use of small
interfering RNA (siRNA). These molecules are short double-stranded RNA duplex
molecules with lengths that vary across species (15-21 nucleotides). They
also generally contain 5' phosphates and 3' two-nucleotide overhangs. The
most effective siRNA molecules share 100 percent identity with the targeted
gene and no significant homology with any other gene. Other chemical
properties of siRNA important for optimal function have been and continue to
be defined (1). Researchers currently employ two different methods for the
production of siRNA: enzymatic generation or chemical synthesis. This article
briefly discusses the difference between these two methods as well as the
advantages and disadvantages of each. Experimental results in this article
also demonstrate that enzymatic generation may cause fewer non-specific
effects than chemical synthesis.
Chemical Synthesis of siRNA:
The chemical synthesis of siRNA utilizes time-tested
methods of solid-phase support chemistry for generating oligomers of
deoxyribonucleotides such as PCR primers. For siRNA, the same core facilities
and commercial providers having access to the required equipment synthesize
oligomers of ribonucleotides having complementary sequences. The oligos are
then mixed allowing them to anneal, lyophilized and shipped. The required
oligo sequence derives from a short 19- to 21-nt segment of the desired
target gene. Designers use sophisticated computer algorithms to define the
optimal siRNA sequence for the targeted gene. These programs have been
experimentally verified using training sets of siRNA directed toward a small
subset of genes. For optimal efficacy, designers define and use as many as
four different segments of the targeted gene sequence for the chemical
synthesis of siRNA.
Several manufacturers offer services to chemically
synthesize oligo for siRNA with high purity and guaranteed sequences.
However, the development of the computer algorithms and the synthesis of
multiple RNA oligos significantly increase the price. Although the computer
programs rely on experimentation initially, the manufacturer does not
necessarily test each designed and synthesized siRNA by direct
experimentation leaving the task to individual end-user. However, the
researcher can easily order and screen several siRNA duplexes at the same
time. Also, optimal siRNA efficacy against the target gene often requires
high concentrations of oligos potentially causing non-specific effects. (See
below.)
Advantages:
Readily available from several
manufacturers
Purity and oligo sequence always consistent
Multiple potential siRNA duplexes easily screened
Disadvantages:
High cost and long preparation time
Each duplex or pool of duplexes must be tested for efficacy
Used at a relatively high concentration
Enzymatic Generation of siRNA:
The enzymatic generation of siRNA requires a cloned
gene-specific fragment of the targeted gene or a clone of the full-length
cDNA (2). This plasmid serves as a substrate in an enzymatic process
involving multiple steps to generate a population of siRNA molecules.
Amplification of the gene or fragment using primers containing flanking
sequence and the T7 promoter generates a double-stranded DNA containing the
T7 promoter on both sides to allow transcription of both strands. A simple in
vitro transcription reaction using T7 RNA polymerase followed by DNAse
treatment yields a long piece of double-stranded RNA. Treatment with the E.
coli enzyme RNase III or an appropriate source of the Dicer enzyme randomly
cleaves the RNA into a population of siRNA molecules. This method does not
rely on design parameters or even necessarily the full sequence information
of the targeted gene. The use of a population of duplexes is also similar to
the endogenous mechanism of RNAi where the Dicer enzyme digests a long duplex
between message and antisense message into many siRNA molecules.
A few companies offer inexpensive kits for enzymatically
generating siRNA for a gene of interest; however, cloning the gene or
gene-specific fragment requires more time and money to complete. Others
companies, such as SABiosciences, prepare
gene-specific siRNA population, validate them with cell-based assays, and
provide them to researchers in equally inexpensive kits. No special equipment
(such as an oligonucleotide synthesizer) is required to enzymatically
generate siRNA. The use of a population of siRNA duplexes suggests that this
method may be less specific than carefully designed and sequence-based oligos;
however, the experiment below suggests the opposite might be true.
Advantages:
Low cost and one-day preparation time
Mimics the endogenous process
Can be performed in any laboratory setting and only one population screened
Knowledge of design parameters or complete sequence information not required
Disadvantages:
Process requires researcher to
perform multiple enzymatic and purification steps
Difficult to increase siRNA yield
Comparing the "Off Target Effect" of the Two
Methods:
A recent and very eloquent published study (3) attempts
to ascertain whether siRNA designed for a specific gene non-specifically
affects the expression of any other genes in the genome. The group chemically
synthesizes siRNA directed toward the MAPK14 gene and transfect it into
cells. They then isolate RNA and used it for a genome-wide microarray study.
Interestingly, the siRNA decreases the expression not only of the targeted
gene but also a number of other genes with the same kinetics. This result
suggests that the effect is mediated by the siRNA directly and not by the
down-regulation of MAPK14, which would have occurred with a delayed time
course. Examination of the other affected genes reveals sequences nearly
identical to the synthesized siRNA with only one or two substitutions. The
results of the paper suggest that short (15-21 nt) double-stranded RNA oligos
may not be quite unique enough to target only one gene in the entire genome.
However, the paper also shows that the magnitude of
off-target non-specific effect decreases with smaller amounts of transfected
siRNA. This observation suggests that populations of enzymatically-generated
siRNA may have a distinct advantage over chemically synthesized siRNA. Each
duplex in the population has a different sequence and probably has a
different off-target effect (non-specifically targets a different set of
genes) based on their sequence. However, the individual duplexes in the
population represent only a small fraction of total siRNA concentration.
Their concentration may small enough not to elicit the non-specific effect,
or each duplex may have at least a minimal off-target effect. Since each
duplex completely matches the target gene, each should have an additive
effect on targeted gene. As a result, enzymatically-generated siRNA may have
a reduced off-target effect.

Figure1: Reduced "Off-Target" Effect with
Enzymatically-Generated siRNA. HEK-293T cells were transfected with
either a negative control (GFP) SureSilencing siRNA population (C, at 20 nM),
or a MAPK14 SureSilencing siRNA population from SABiosciences (at 5
and 20 nM), or four chemically synthesized MAPK14 siRNA duplexes (at 5 and 20
nM). RNA was harvested from cells 24 h post-transfection and used to analyze
the expression level of four different genes (MAPK14, RRAD, CTGF, and GAPD.)
by RT-PCR.
The experiment in Figure 1 tests and verifies this
hypothesis. In an experiment modeled on work described above, two commercial
sources of siRNA directed towards the MAPK14 gene were transfected into cells
at two different concentrations, an enzymatically generated population using
a gene-specific fragment and four chemically synthesized oligos having
sequences derived from the same gene-specific region. The expression of the
target gene and two other genes identified in the previous work, relative to
control-transfected cells, was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR.
The results demonstrate that both siRNA reagents (at 20 nM)
decrease the expression of the targeted MAPK14 gene by at least 70 percent.
Neither siRNA method affects the expression of GAPD. However, the synthetic
siRNA also non-specifically decreases the expression of RRAD and increases
the expression of CTGF, even at the lower concentration (5 nM). The
enzymatically-generated population does not affect the expression of these
genes even at the higher concentration (20 nM). The reproducible results
achieved for this single gene support the hypothesis that enzymatically
generated siRNA more specifically knocks down the expression of the targeted
gene than chemically synthesized siRNA.
Chemical synthesis and enzymatic generation represent two
roughly equivalent methods for the production of siRNA useful for RNAi of a
specific gene of interest. They both have practical advantages and
disadvantages helping researchers decide the best method for their
application and their time, budget and manpower considerations. However, this
article demonstrates that enzymatically-generated siRNA more specifically
targets a gene of interest than chemically synthesized siRNA. This
observation gives the enzymatic method another experimental advantage making
more worth the effort to perform.
1. Reynolds, A. et al. (2004). Nature Biotechnology 22,
326-330.
2. Yang, D. et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 9942-9947.
3. Jackson et al. (2003) Nature Biotechnology 12(6): 635-7.