|
RNA Interference (RNAi), the process of
introducing RNA molecules into cells to suppress the expression of a gene of
interest, has become a very powerful and widely used tool to analyze gene
function particularly for drug discovery and toxicological studies. It even
has the potential to serve as a gene-specific therapeutic agent. The rapid
expansion of this technology now includes several methods each applicable to
different applications. When first using RNAi, researchers and investigators
have a lot of choices and decisions to make. This article discusses the
sources and methods for RNAi, how and when to use them, as well as the
relationship between the cell type and transfection method used with RNAi.
1. Introduction:
RNAi was first observed as a natural phenomenon in plants, C. elegans and D.
melanogaster (1-3). These organisms express anti-sense RNA complementary to
an expressed message. The two strands anneal to generate long double-stranded
RNA (dsRNA). An enzyme known as Dicer digests long dsRNA into short (< 30
nucleotide) RNA duplexes having 3-prime two-nucleotide overhangs and 5-prime
phosphates. These molecules are known as small interfering RNA (siRNA). A
complex of proteins known as the RNA Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) then
unwinds siRNA and uses one strand to identify other copies of the original
message by the annealing of identical sequences. RISC cuts the mRNA in the
middle of the shared sequence leaving the message susceptible to degradation
by exonucleases thereby silencing the expression of the corresponding gene.
RNAi also occurs in the more commonly used model system of mammalian cells,
which contain conserved machinery (4). Experimental methods take advantage of
the endogenous mechanism to suppress the expression of interesting genes by
the exogenous introduction of nucleic acid. Some model systems accept
antisense RNA or even dsRNA. However, the introduction of long dsRNA (greater
than 50 base pairs) to mammalian cells induces the interferon-based
anti-viral response, which causes cell death (apoptosis). Instead,
experimental RNAi in the mammalian system involves the introduction of siRNA,
typically 21 to 23 base pair duplexes, or small hairpin RNA (shRNA). These
shRNA molecules consist of a single stand having the sequence of the two
desired siRNA strands connected by non-relevant sequence. The two
complementary portions anneal intra-molecularly folding the strand into a
hairpin. The endogenous Dicer enzyme recognizes and cleaves the odd RNA
structure into the desired siRNA molecule. Generating these two classes of
molecules utilizes a variety of methods each tailored for specific
applications.
2. Summary of RNAi Methods:
Chemically Synthesized siRNA
Chemically synthesized siRNA relies on the same solid-phase support chemistry
used to generate DNA primers for PCR.
Expression Vectors and
Viral Vectors (including adenoviral, retroviral and lentiviral)
Containing siRNA or shRNA
Expression
or viral vectors and their RNA polymerase III (Pol III) promoters drive the
expression of either siRNA transcripts, as separate sense and antisense
strands that anneal in the cell, or a single short hairpin RNA transcript
(5-8). Human and mouse U6 and the human H1 are the most commonly used RNA
polymerase III promoters. The polymerase III enzyme initiates and
terminates RNA transcripts at well-defined positions (9) making its
promoters well suited for the synthesis of siRNA or shRNA.
PCR-generated siRNA or shRNA
Expression Cassettes and
In vitro transcribed siRNA or shRNA
The
short length of these Pol III promoters (less than 300 bp) facilitates the
generation of expression cassettes using PCR methods to amplify a linear
fragment of double-stranded DNA containing the necessary promoters and the
siRNA or shRNA sequence (10). Either the cassette itself or the purified in
vitro transcript of the cassette serves as the source of nucleic acid for
RNAi.
Populations of siRNA generated
from RNase III or Dicer digested dsRNA
Finally,
treatment of dsRNA in vitro with purified mammalian Dicer or the E. coli
enzyme RNase III digests the nucleic acid into a population of siRNA
duplexes. Generation of the dsRNA involves the in vitro transcription of
both strands of either a gene-specific fragment or a full-length cDNA of
the gene of interest cloned into an appropriate vector.
3. Delivery Methods:
Each of these classes of nucleic acid can be introduced
into cells by a number of methods. In lipid-mediated transfection, cells take
in non-covalent complexes between nucleic acid and a lipid or polymer reagent
by endocytosis. Electroporation utilizes a brief electrical pulse to cause
disruptions or holes in the cells' plasma membrane through which nucleic acid
enters. Both of these methods successfully deliver any of the RNAi nucleic
acids expect viral vectors. Viral vector delivery only occurs by infection of
cells with the corresponding virus generated via a multi-step process. Viral
vectors lack the ability to replicate themselves. Specialized cells express
the missing genes necessary for viral replication and packaging. These cells
produce and release virus into the culture medium upon conventional
transfection with the viral vector. The virus containing the viral vector is
collected and purified. Infection of the desired cell line with virus
introduces the siRNA or shRNA and knocks down gene expression. The viral
delivery method absolutely requires the use of viral vectors and cannot
accommodate the other sources of nucleic acid for RNAi.
4. Cell Types:
Successful delivery of siRNA into cells is the most crucial
step in efficiently and effectively knocking down the expression of a gene of
interest in cultured mammalian cells by RNAi. Several lines of evidence
demonstrate that functional siRNA completely suppresses expression of the gene
of interest in an individual cell as long as it enters that cell. Very
sophisticated bioinformatic computer algorithms, now available, almost
guarantee the functionality of the designed siRNA. Poor delivery of siRNA
remains the most common reason for ineffective gene silencing. Cells vary
widely in their ability to take up nucleic acid. The more readily a cell line
acquires nucleic acid, the more easily siRNA silences genes in that cell.
Therefore, the delivery method of choice depends greatly on the cell line of
interest.
Lipid-mediated transfection, the most commonly
used method, works for the most commonly used cell types, particularly any
stable, secondary, transformed adherent or suspension cell line. Other commonly
used cell types (such as primary cell lines, macrophages, hematopoetic cell
lines and neuronal cell lines) prove very difficult to transfect with any
nucleic acid using lipids. For these cell lines, electroporation provides an
alternative method to deliver siRNAs into these cells. However, this method
causes high rates of cell death. Besides electroporation, the viral delivery
systems (lentivirus, retrovirus and adenovirus) also prove useful for the
introduction of siRNA into difficultly transfected cell types, especially
primary cells. Lentivirus efficiently infects dividing and non-dividing cells,
but retrovirus only infects dividing cells. Adenovirus infects a broad range of
cells, including dividing and non-dividing cell types.
5. Transient Versus Stable Transfection:
Nucleic acid, especially siRNA, introduced into cells
generally lacks the ability to replicate itself. Therefore, the cells
eventually lose the nucleic acid due to dilution by cell division. In
transient transfection, assays to determine the effect of the nucleic acid
(siRNA) on the cell system occur within a few days after transfection. In
stable transfection, introduction of the nucleic acid of interest and an
appropriate selection marker allows the selection (over the course of weeks)
for the few cells that stably integrated the nucleic acid into their genome.
Once expanded, these cells permanently contain the nucleic acid and express
any encoding genes (or siRNA). Investigators may then perform functional
assays at their leisure. Any of the RNA interference methods work in a
transient transfection experiment. Typically, only vector-based systems
function in stable transfections. Lentiviruses and retroviruses integrate
into host genome on their own to generate stable gene silencing cell lines
with high efficiency (11,12). In contrast, adenoviruses rarely integrate into
the host genome; therefore, this delivery method works better to transiently
silence the gene of interest (13).
Summary:
Table 1 summarizes many of the generalizations that this
article presents. Transient transfections of any RNAi source suffice for
short-term experiments, while long-term experiments require stable
transfection of expression or viral vectors. The heartier or more easily
handled cells transfect with lipids or electroporation, while more fragile
and difficultly handled cells require viral delivery. Therefore, the RNA
interference method of choice depends on the conditions of the individual
experiment.
Table 1. Summary of RNA Interference
Methods
| Cell Type |
Delivery Method |
RNAi Source |
| Stable,Secondary,Transformed, Adherent and/or
Suspension |
1. Lipid-mediated transfection
2. Electroporation
3. Virus |
1. Any except virus
2. Any except virus
3. Viral vector only |
| Primary,Untransformed |
1. Electroporation
2. Virus |
1. Any except virus
2. Viral vector only |
| Very difficult to transfect |
1. Virus |
1. Viral vector only |
Related Products:
For transient transfections into stable, secondary, transformed adherent or
suspension cells:
SureSilencing™ Human and Mouse siRNA Kits
SureSilencing™ Human and Mouse siRNA and Antibody
Kits
SureSilencing™ Pathway Sets: Gene-Specific
siRNA Populations
For transient transfections into stable, secondary, transformed adherent
cells:
siRNA Array Plates: Six-well plates
pre-coated with matrix of transfection reagent and single siRNA
References:
-
Ingelbrecht I, Van Houdt H, Van Montagu M, and
Depicker A. (1994) Posttranscriptional silencing of reporter transgenes
in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:
10502-10506.
-
Fire A, et al. Potent and specific genetic
interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature.
1998 391: 806-11.
-
Hammond S. M., et al. (2000) An RNA-directed nuclease
mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature
404, 293-6.
-
Elbashir S. M., et al. (2001) Duplexes of
21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells.
Nature 411, 494-8.
-
Paddison,P.J. et al.(2002) Short hairpin
RNAs(shRNAs)induce sequence-specific silencing in mammalian cells. Genes
Dev.16,948-958.
-
Sui, G. et al.(2002) A DNA vector-based RNAi
technology to suppress gene expression in mammalian cells.
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. U.S.A. 99, 6047-6052.
-
Paul,C.P. et al. (2002) Effective expression of small
interfering RNA in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol.20,505-508.
-
Miyagishi M, et al. (2002) U6 promoter-driven siRNAs
with four uridine 3' overhangs efficiently suppress targeted gene
expression in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol.20, 497-500.
-
Goomer RS, et al. (1992) The transcriptional start
site for a human U6 small nuclear RNA gene is dictated by a compound
promoter element consisting of the PSE and the TATA box. Nucleic Acids
Res. Sep 25;20(18):4903-12.
-
catanotto,D. et al.(2002) Functional siRNA expression
from transfectd PCR products. RNA 8, 1454-1460.
-
Barton, G.M. et al. (2002) Retroviral delivery of
small interfering RNA into primary cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
99(23):14943-5.
-
Abbas-Terki,T. et al.(2002) Lentiviral-mediated RNA
interference. Hum.Gene Ther. 13, 2197-2201.
-
Xia,H. et al.(2002)siRNA-mediate gene silencing in
vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol.20,1006-1010.
|